My first experience with the Fujifilm XF 35mm was with a very early pre-production model that arrived alongside an equally early X-Pro1. The X-Pro1, paired with the XF 35mm, an 18mm, and a challenging 60mm, marked the inaugural chapter of Fujifilm’s X series cameras. Among these, it was the XF 35mm that truly captured my attention.
The wide f/1.4 aperture offered a shallow depth of field, beautifully separating subjects from their backgrounds. The smooth bokeh and impressive accuracy, even at the pre-production stage, were standout features.
The Fujifilm X-Pro1 Launch
I was tasked with capturing images for the Fujifilm X-Pro1 launch. This included long-exposure photography and a documentary series covering a fine art exhibition entitled “Things That Fall Between.”
The X-Pro1 was unveiled at the final Focus on Imaging Show before it transitioned into The Photography Show. From that point the XF 35mm became my go-to lens for the X-Pro1 and, shortly after, the Fujifilm X-Pro2.
The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4
The XF 35mm f/1.4 became my go to lens with my early X series photography. If it involved people or documentary it was the first lens I reached for.
Below are examples of its use:
Portrait photography (The Guitar Maker & Kyle John Suckling) | Long-exposure shots (St. John’s Point) | Black-and-white captures (Belfast Photography) | Creative explorations (The Things That Fall Between).
XF35 f/1.4 Gallery
However, the XF 35mm f/1.4 isn’t perfect for all genres. In music photography, for instance, its performance can be a little inconsistent. While there may be more out-of-focus shots than you may like, when it delivers, it truly delivers.
What is Bokeh?
Music Photography
Portrait Photography
The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR
In 2016, I had the opportunity to use the XF 35mm f/2 R WR during a trip and hike along the Cape to Cape in Margaret River, Australia. The performance jump was immediately noticeable, and it quickly became my everyday lens as we explored the bush and rugged coast.
The f/2 lens brings substantial benefits, though there are compromises. Below are the key differences between the two lenses.
Affordability
Firstly and perhaps most importantly. The XF 35mm f/1.4 is more expensive, with a price difference of around £200 compared to the XF 35mm f/2.
Fujifilm XF35mm f/2 Gallery
Aperture and Performance
The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 features a wide maximum aperture of f/1.4, making it excellent for low-light situations and creating a shallow depth of field with beautifully smooth bokeh. While the XF 35mm f/2 has a slightly smaller maximum aperture of f/2, it still performs well in low light but lacks the same depth-of-field separation as the f/1.4.
The larger aperture of the XF 35mm f/1.4 has earned it a reputation for its unique rendering. The lens offers a distinctive character and a cinematic feel. On the other hand, the XF 35mm f/2 delivers sharper and more consistent performance, though it may lack some of the artistic charm associated with the f/1.4 it still captures stunning images.
Weather Sealing
One of the standout features of the XF 35mm f/2 is its weather sealing, making it ideal for shooting in challenging conditions such as rain or mist. I’ve taken this lens into the Mourne Mountains with the Fujifilm X-M5, where it performed exceptionally well. (See the gallery for mountain photos.) The panoramic image below was captured during our annual New Year’s Day mountain trip. Click for a larger view.
Size & Form
Both lenses are small and compact, so size isn’t a major concern. The XF 35mm f/1.4 is slightly larger and heavier, and feels a little more robust and durable. In contrast, the XF 35mm f/2 is more compact and lightweight, making it a great choice for street photography or travel, where portability is key.
Fujifilm XF 35mm Autofocus
The XF 35mm f/1.4 was introduced with Fujifilm’s first X-series camera in 2012, so it relies on an older autofocus system. This system can be slower and noisier compared to modern lenses and may struggle in low-light conditions. That said, when the f/1.4 delivers, it truly excels.
In comparison, the XF 35mm f/2 benefits from Fujifilm’s newer autofocus technology. It offers faster, quieter, and more reliable performance, even in challenging scenarios. I find I achieve more consistent results with the f/2, though the choice ultimately depends on shooting priorities.
In Conclusion
The XF 35mm f/2 has become my primary lens for documentary photography due to its portability, weather sealing, and improved autofocus. That said, the XF 35mm f/1.4 still holds a special place for scenarios where artistic rendering and bokeh are paramount.
Choose the XF 35mm f/2 for portability, faster autofocus, weather sealing, and consistent sharpness in everyday photography.
Choose the XF 35mm f/1.4 for artistic rendering, low-light performance, and when you have the luxury of time to perfect your shots.
Links
Documentary Photography
What is Bokeh?
Portrait Photography
The Fujifilm 27mm Lens review
Discover more from FLIXELPIX
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.